Developing leaders is not as formulaic and prescribed as many have believed in the past. Through theories and practices from influential thought leaders and writers, I’ve seen the plethora of approaches and perspectives first-hand. Recently, I’ve grown to appreciate the great investment of time and energy that is required in developing leaders specific to different contexts, sectors and preparing for the unknown future the lies ahead of each of us.
Pushing employees through uniform corporate training and development programs may achieve some goal for unloading company information and molding them into the idealistic walking and talking example of your core values; however, in today’s rapidly changing and greatly diversified workforce, the need for tailored development opportunities is great. I, for one, constantly crave opportunities to grow and learn from individuals and programs that recognize the uniqueness of me through my experiences and strengths.
One of the leading influencers in today’s conversation on strengths-based leadership development, Marcus Buckingham has just written an article, Leadership Development in the Age of the Algorithm in the Harvard Business Review that speaks to the value of changing our approach in today’s world of targeted Facebook advertisements and models like Netflix’s approach to our movie preferences. We’re living in the “age of the algorithm” with formulas and models developing specific advertisements and options for us based on our behaviors and preferences
“Even a decade after leadership training began to recognize different styles and strengths, and even in organizations that have made cultivating high-potential talent a priority, the content served up is generic. Your leadership program tells you that you’re a vital part of your organization’s future, but it displays little understanding of you.”
Through Buckingham’s work with Hilton Worldwide and their leadership team, he shares five steps to creating an algorithmic model of leadership development. One of the most poignant steps that I found to be particularly relevant in today’s world of changing models and strategies was “make the system dynamically intelligent.” This key element allows for learners to learn from each other along the way. As Buckingham writes, “…the power of a dynamically intelligent system that draws on peer-to-peer sharing wholly overturns the prevailing model of leadership development.” Through learning from peers and encouraging sharing amongst learners in your leadership development efforts, each one’s “leadership algorithm” is refocused and refined.
Ultimately, by using an adaptable development lens that shares concepts and lessons to consider rather than formulaic techniques to master, leadership development can be more effective in the future as our world recognizes more of what we prefer, how we behave and what kind of leader we are made to be.
